'Refugee capital' drives Dubai property revival - Citigroup

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

Dubai’s real estate market revival, which recently saw queues of buyers lining up at the launch of high profile new off-plan developments, is being driven by ‘refugee capital’ from buyers in countries such as Iran, Pakistan and Egypt, according to a new report.

The emirate, which was one of the worst hit real estate markets during the downturn, recently witnessed queues of buyers snapping up new projects by some of Dubai’s best known master developers.

Indebted government developer Nakheel, which reported that net profit for the first nine months of 2012 had nearly doubled to AED1.1bn (US$299.5m), sold almost AED1bn worth of property when it launched its latest project on Palm Jumeirah earlier this month.

At the same time, Emaar Properties sold out all its units in one day when it launched its latest project in Downtown Dubai in September.

Investment firm Citigroup’s latest ‘MENA Construction Projects Tracker’ report described this upsurge in demand as “something of a mini-revival”.

“We believe this has been driven by ‘refugee capital’ from buyers facing geo-political risk and currency depreciation in their domestic markets, e.g. India, Iran, Pakistan and Egypt,” the report said.

However, the report warned that this revival may be short-lived and focused on specific buildings rather than large-scale projects.

This was backed up by data on Sunday by the Dubai Land Department, which found that the total value of property transactions in Dubai reached more than AED83bn ($22.6bn) in the first nine months of 2012 but was focused on some key areas.

Emaar Properties’ Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest building, topped the list of most traded areas in terms of units with 3,305 sale transactions. In the land mortgage transactions, Al Barsha South First was the most traded area with 203 transactions while the Burj Khalifa saw 442 apartment mortgage transactions.

The Citigroup report was also cautious of the fact that while the number of projects awarded in the first nine months of 2012 was up 83 percent year-on-year. It claimed this increase was driven by a few Abu Dhabi mega project awards, such as US$6bn worth of petrochemical projects, a US$3bn nuclear power project and a US$2bn infrastructure project.

In terms of cancelled and delayed projects in the region, this rose 2 percent to around US$1.5trn, with the UAE accounting for US$757bn, or over 50 percent of all projects still canned or in limbo.

Related:
Topics
Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: mxNTzqBczCUtIqZ

Do not let stupidity pnevert you from making the right decisions for you. It's comprehensible because you have a conscience, you'd like to pay, but things happen.

Posted by: Michel

Yes it is true in certain specific areas & Developers like Burj Khalifa Downtown, Arabian Ranches, Palm Jumeira, etc. In Downtown I brought an apartment in May 2009, and sold this after 3 years this July. Alongwith the SP, including the rental income & after deducting service charges I have made 107.948% in 38 months i.e. approx. 34.089% P.A. I sold it to a HNI Banker from Europe & not to any refugee. But it is true that many buyers have come into the market from Iran, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Pakistan and also Indians (ranked 2nd amongst Buyers) & CIS, few Chinese. Places like JLT, TECOM, Int'l City still very poor.

Posted by: Saad

How could Citi make such a claim without data to back it up!!!!! Did they look at the nationalities of buyers in the market now? I doubt it

Posted by: Farhan

this article looks like a desperate attempt to prove something is moving.. irrespective of whether it actually is happening or not. Still not sure wht do they actually mean when they say "refugee" funds.. specially when marking it towards India!!

Posted by: Red Snappa

Looking at it from another perspective doesn't an incursion of refugees, presumably high-ish profile if they can afford to pay for sanctuary, raise the prospect of increased security risk and therefore increased public protection requirements? The term 'safe haven', omitting its usage in financial circles, is all very well, but you have to keep it that way.

Plus I concur, this is a somewhat tenuous short-term boost to the property market.

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

All comments are subject to approval before appearing

Further reading

Features & Analysis
Trump casino resort business files for bankruptcy

Trump casino resort business files for bankruptcy

The Donald founded the companies but is now suing them to have...

Do celebrity branded projects ever work?

Do celebrity branded projects ever work?

The long list of celebrity-endorsed real estate developments...

1
Is this the end of the Gulf’s Indian cash dash?

Is this the end of the Gulf’s Indian cash dash?

From currency woes to taxation loopholes closing and a clampdown...

3
Most Popular
Most Discussed