Liberté, égalité, fraternité – but no burqa
by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on Wednesday, 24 June 2009
It must have come as a shock to the country’s five million-strong Muslim population to learn last week that the burqa is “not welcome” in France.
In the first address in 136 years before a joint session of the French parliament, amid the worst recession in history, Sarkozy chose to lead with a speech that can effectively be summed up as: ‘Welcome to secular France – please leave your burqa at the door’.
In it, he described the traditional covering as a "sign of subservience, of lowering”, and the women who wear them as “trapped behind a fence” and “deprived of any identity”. (He also branded the world economy a catastrophe, and warned that nothing will ever be the same again. But that is by the by.)
Unsurprisingly, the responses have poured in thick and fast. Politically speaking, few things excite such fury or carry such symbolism as the way women dress. In Saudi Arabia, uncovered hair can mean jail; while in parts of Germany, it’s illegal to wear the hijab in schools. In sections of Afghanistan, opting not to look like a blue shuttlecock can mean a death sentence.
Women’s skirt lengths can even signal the state of the economy, according to US economist George Taylor. The hemline index argues that lower skirts coincide with a falling market – a frock index, if you will.
So Sarkozy’s anti-burqa rhetoric was sure to provoke a reaction. It’s the equivalent of political gunpowder; guaranteed to blow open a heated debate, to incite sections of the Muslim community, and to knock everything else off the front page.
It has even split the French cabinet. In a strange role reversal, Rama Yade, the Muslim human rights minister, said she would be open to a ban, while the immigration minister, Eric Besson, believes a ban will only create tensions. As topics go, it’s a real all-rounder.
The response of France’s large Muslim community has largely been one of bewilderment. "We are shocked by the idea parliament should be put to work on such a marginal issue,” said Mohammed Moussaoui, the head of the French Council for the Muslim Religion.
He’s right to be confused. The burqa is rare enough in France that even the lawmakers railing against it are unable to say exactly how many women choose to wear it.
There are just “more and more of them”, one lawmaker said vaguely, sounding more like a hysterical redneck than a politician.
More importantly, and as Sarkozy - a man who is the epitome of being more show than substance - is aware, any talk of a ban is pointless. Firstly, it’s been four years since France banned “conspicuous” religious symbols, including the hijab, in state schools, hospitals and administration buildings - so the burqa is already barred from public institutions.
Secondly, if you are going to rant against the burqa, then nuns’ habits would be next on the banned list– and that would be a move too far for the once-Catholic France.
But the fire has neatly diverted attention from the real issues of the day. In covering Sarkozy’s speech, no paper led with the fact that France’s budget deficit will exceed seven percent of its GDP in both 2009 and 2010.
Hardly any column inches were devoted to the fact that, hours after the speech, Sarkozy fired six ministers, and replaced another two. No; as intended, the burqa has stolen the show.
As publicity stunts go, this is more about realpolitik than real women. Still, it’s the first rule of politics – when things are going badly, deflect.
READERS' COMMENTS
Posted by Kevin on Monday 29 June 2009 at 17:10 UAE time
If any lady, whether from US or South Africa were to enter Saudi Arabia they have to wear the hijab! Well no one seems to be objectin to that,so why does Saorkozy's statement (not actions like KSA) have such a huge impact!
People are ever so blind to take what is not theirs!
Posted by amer, dammam, Saudi Arabia on Saturday 27 June 2009 at 11:55 UAE time
He cant run a country so he is trying to just create a furore on a sensitive issue and everybody goes ga-ga over it.
A country which talks about freedom why dosnt it allow burqa, what kind of freedom is this where people cant wear what they want! and that too not lewd but covered clothes. It is just ridiculous!
Saudi Arabia is a monarchy, and whatever the king wishes it has to be followed and whoever is NOT ready to follow can leave the country. (this comment is for the so called devot muslims who favor Sarkozy and his stupid actions!!!)
There is nothing wrong in wearing burqa, it is a choice by all muslim women and not an oppression.
Posted by Hussain, New York, United States on Thursday 25 June 2009 at 19:31 UAE time
Just wanted to say, I really appreciated the piece. Btw, 'blue shuttlecock'? Priceless :) I'm really glad someone's chosen to write about the absurdity of all of this, or at the least voice the concerns of the minority French Muslims that do chose to wear it.
With all due respect to some of the other comments I've seen here about whether the burqa of any other veiling garment is relevant or not to the cultural or religious matrix of France or the 21st century is a non issue. France, is a declared secular State (as opposed to comparing it to Saudi, apples and oranges), and I think that limits the legal discourse to certain broadly accepted norms. Secularism is embracing all faiths in their forms of symbolism, it's not picking berries chosing only that which fits into an onlooker's comfort zone. And on a higher level, government has no right to be interfering in my outfit choices as long as I live up to certain social norms (think-lewd behavior charges). Additionally, when legislating for a minority (in this case, the minority that do wear it), voice is given to protect it's choices, rather than to marginalize it. Finally, by volunteering the reasoning for this 'ban' as deeming these garments a sign of opression etc., is insulting to the intellect and integrity of the women that wear it. Why should a woman's ability to contribute meaningfully to the evolution and betterment of her society be dictated by what she wears, or for that matter doesn't wear. And let alone, for the State to insist that her clothing and any perceived mindset that comes lock step with the garment is detrimental, is insulting to the collective intelligence of women as a whole.
Needless to say, this, of all issues, was the most unnecessary to raise in a stump speech during a rare appearance in parliament akin to the State of the Union, using that platform has unfairly emboldened one side, while leaving the other side of the debate voiceless and foregone, in what by all accounts is a proud and fully representative democracy.
Posted by Abu Khaled, Dubai, UAE on Thursday 25 June 2009 at 15:01 UAE time
It is freedom and civilized to have nude beaches, but it is not freedom to wear according to one’s religious believes!!!
I read the article and the comments and the first thing that popped to my mind was: Oh!! Not again!! My respect to Mr. Sarkozy, but his opinion that burqa is "sign of subservience, of lowering”, and the women who wear them as “trapped behind a fence” and “deprived of any identity” reflect lack of knowledge, racism and extremism. I was shocked that it came from a man who always appears to be intelligent and know what he is talking about.
Using the same level of his thinking, one could argue that having nude beaches were everyone walks naked is “sign of primitive ages, and the people who practice nudity in public have no moral decency or self respect”. It is free to walk naked, but it is not free to cover??!!!
Some readers stressed that if one does not adapt to a country’s culture, must leave. This is absolutely true. But a country should not claim “civilization, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and democracy” and at the same time contradicts its self, and deprive ‘some’ people from living according to their beliefs. One thing that should be obvious to the world is that Saudi Arabia is the origin of Islam and, therefore, do not expect to see bars, nude beaches, and uncovered women there.
Before this we had the Danish attack on the prophet. Mr. Sarkozy... you goofed!!! Why can’t we live and let live?




