Saudi Algosaibi sues Mashreq in US over Saad deals
by This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on Monday, 24 August 2009
Saudi conglomerate Algosaibi on Monday said it would sue Dubai-based Mashreq bank in a New York court, alleging the lender of being "wilfully blind" to irregular deals that helped lead Algosaibi into default.
Saudi firms Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi and Bros Co (AHAB) and Saad Group are restructuring combined debt worth up to an estimated $22 billion in one of the biggest blows yet in the global financial crisis, that has left dozens of banks exposed and threatened to dampen Saudi's economic recovery.
"These transactions have no legitimate commercial purpose," AHAB's legal counsel Eric Lewis told reporters in a conference call before filing the suit in the New York State Supreme Court.
The suit follows Mashreq's $150 million suit filed earlier this year against Algosaibi, in a tit-for-tat case that looks increasingly likely to see the biggest corporate default ever in the Middle East battled out in US courts.
The planned suit comes as the Algosaibi group attempts to keep its creditors in line as it struggles to restructure its obligations. Suing Mashreq sends a signal to other banks on the challenges they might face if they step out of the restructuring talks and sue Algosaibi directly.
Mashreq bank, the third-biggest bank by market value in the UAE, rejected Algosaibi's claims.
"The charges are completely without merit, outrageous in the extreme and really nothing more than an attempt by Algosaibi (AHAB) to divert attention away from their own responsibility," Mashreq said in an emailed statement.
A spokesman for Saad Group and its billionaire owner Maan al-Sanea did not respond to email or telephone queries. Saad, however, said in July that separate moves by a Cayman Islands court to freeze $9.2 billion of its assets was part of a "baseless" campaign against it by Algosaibi.
Mashreq's case against Algosaibi's individual partners alleged that Algosaibi guaranteed both a $150 million Algosaibi transaction and a $75 million transaction for The International Banking Corporation (TIBC), which is owned by Algosaibi.
Lewis said Mashreq made $12 million in profit through irregular short-term loans that were rolled over continuously as a means of financing the Money Exchange currency trading house owned by Saad.
"We have a good counter-claim which we would assert against Mashreq bank for aiding and abetting the fraud of Mr. Sanea by being wilfully blind to these transactions on which they were making excessive profit," Lewis said.
"Any reasonable banker would know that you don't finance $150 million of working capital by rolling (it) over every seven days and are paying 12-14 points above the base rate," he said.
Algosaibi's and Saad's debt troubles and ensuing legal battles have sent shockwaves through Middle East finance, calling into question the region's regulatory framework and legal practices.
AHAB has sued al-Sanea for fraud in a case involving allegations of $10 billion in loan irregularities.
Sanea is alleged to have siphoned off that $10 billion from the Algosaibi family owned group for his personal business, according to the earlier fraud suit.
Mashreq said it was suing AHAB over alleged irregularities which it did not specify. That case is expected to come before a New York judge later this week. (Reuters)
READERS' COMMENTS
Posted by Paul Onty on Wednesday 26 August 2009 at 10:27 UAE time
I think this a case of neither the Saudis not the Emiratis trusting their own legal system and hence relying on a legal system that is transparent and correctly codified.
Posted by Jack Black on Wednesday 26 August 2009 at 07:48 UAE time
GREED...
Posted by a reader on Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 11:41 UAE time
they are publicly traded in the NYSE.
Posted by Ivo Cerckel, Siquijor, Philippines on Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 07:53 UAE time
A tit-for-tat case that looks increasingly likely to see the biggest corporate default ever in the Middle East battled out in U.S. courts?
How can U.S. courts have jurisdiction in a dispute between a Dubai bank and a Saudi conglomerate?
The U.S. court system is being financed by ther U.S. taxpayer. How can the U.S. taxpayer be forced to pay for the resolution of this dispute between a Dubai bank and a Saudi conglomerate?
Because the money was sent to a New York bank account, said an Abu Dhabi newspaper last week?
The only posible answer I can come up with is that U.S. provides legal protection to Saudi and UAE nationals and Saudi and UAE companies because the Saudi and UAE dollar-pegs provide monetary protection for the US dollar.
Click here to post a comment
MORE FROM ARABIANBUSINESS.COM
TOP IN MIDDLE EAST BANKING & FINANCE
TOP MIDDLE EAST BUSINESS STORIES
ALSO IN MIDDLE EAST BANKING & FINANCE
LATEST MIDDLE EAST BUSINESS NEWS
- Politics & Economics: Abu Dhabi eyes major growth in non-oil sector
- Travel & Hospitality: Oman Air increases free baggage allowance
- Construction & Industry: Abu Dhabi firm in talks to build Iraqi homes mega project
- Retail: UAE grocery sales growth slumps in 2009
- Construction & Industry: Kuwait eyes $8.7bn development projects
SHARE PRICE CHECK
RELATED STORIES
Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi & Bros
- UAE banks' Saad, Algosaibi exposure seen at $2.9bn
19 Nov '09 | News - Big Kuwait, Bahrain banks Q3 profits sag on Saudi loans
25 Oct '09 | News - Doubts persist after Saudi banks book more provisions
24 Oct '09 | News
Mashreq
- Mashreq expands operations to Kuwait
2 Nov '09 | News - Mashreq's Q3 net profit falls by 42%
29 Oct '09 | News - Mashreq sees 'unprecedented' credit card skips
27 Oct '09 | News
Saad Group
- UAE banks' Saad, Algosaibi exposure seen at $2.9bn
19 Nov '09 | News - Big Kuwait, Bahrain banks Q3 profits sag on Saudi loans
25 Oct '09 | News - Doubts persist after Saudi banks book more provisions
24 Oct '09 | News




