Bahrain
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Print
Email
Discuss this article (2 Comments)The reinvention of management
by Julian Birkinshaw on Wednesday, 28 October 2009
While the economic crisis has been explained as a failure of governance, a failure of regulation, and even a failure of our free-market system, the prosaic truth is that it was a failure of management – a story of awful risk management decisions, perverse incentives systems, and amoral behaviour.
The managerial failures of the big investment banks are only the tip of the iceberg.
Surveys show decreasing levels of trust in business leaders. Fewer than 20 percent of employees are truly “engaged” in the workplace. Managers are portrayed as aloof, vain, or just plain stupid by cartoonist Scott Adams, columnist Lucy Kellaway and comedian Ricky Gervais.
But, while the credibility of “management” as a profession sinks deeper into the mire, its importance as the driver of economic recovery and long-term prosperity is as great as ever.
Management needs to be reinvented; but first we need to understand how we got into this mess in the first place.
I believe we need to go back to the origins of the term “manager” because a large part of the problem is that its meaning has been corrupted.
First, the emergence of the large, bureaucratic, industrialized firm a century ago, and its increasing hegemony in society, led many to equate the term manager with a narrow, hierarchical, formalised way of functioning.
But management simply means “getting work done through others”. A community organiser, a scout leader, and an entrepreneur are all managers as well, but the way they get work done doesn’t feature in our business school textbooks.
The second blow to the credibility of management came from the leadership movement. In order to build up “leadership” as an art, gurus such as Warren Bennis and John Kotter put management into a small box.
Managers, they suggested, were concerned with efficiency and the status quo; leaders were concerned with effectiveness and change. Managers supervised and coordinated; leaders motivated and inspired people.
I am all in favour of effective leadership, but let’s not create artificial distinctions. Leadership is about influencing others – it is about the characteristics of a person that makes them worthy of being followed.
Management is about getting work done through others – which includes making decisions, coordinating activities, motivating people, and setting direction. Barack Obama was elected in large part through his vision and his charisma, that is, his qualities as a leader.
His ability to deliver will now come down in large to his qualities as a manager. Leadership and management are simply two sides of the same coin: effective executives need to be able to do both.
So what is the future of management? The first essential step is to get management back on the same footing as leadership – as an essential, value-adding, and productive activity.
The second step is to rethink our narrow assumptions about the nature of effective management. Management can be done through traditional hierarchical, bureaucratic mechanisms, but it can also be done in a more spontaneous and bottom-up way.
Look at online social communities, open-source software organizations, and voluntary-sector firms: these are all managed, but through a completely different set of principles to the ones we are accustomed to in large bureaucracies.
I don’t believe we need to completely reinvent management. Yes, there are changes afoot, made possible in part by the emergence of Web 2.0 technologies.
But a lot of these putative changes –towards empowered, flat, emergent, and virtual structures – have been promised for decades. Rather than reinventing management in toto, we need at least to rethink the choices we make about how we manage.
Every organization has an implicit management model – a set of choices about how direction is set, how workers are motivated, how decisions are made, and how activities are coordinated. Sometimes the traditional top-down approach works fine, sometimes a more organic, community-based model is more appropriate.
The best managed companies – the ones that can potentially derive competitive advantage from their management model – will in the future be the ones that make conscious choices that suit their circumstances, rather than falling back on the default model invented by Frederick Taylor and Alfred P Sloan in the 1920s and 1930s.
Julian Birkinshaw is Professor of Strategic and International Management at London Business School. His new book, Reinventing Management, will be published by Jossey-Bass in 2010.
READERS' COMMENTS
Disclaimer: The views expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by ArabianBusiness.com or its employees.
What has gone wrong with management?
Posted by Whatan, Dubai, UAE on Thursday 29 October 2009 at 16:52 UAE time
Why does nobody want to be in charge any more? Nobody wants to be bossed; and nobody wants to be the boss. People are abdicating more and more responsibility every day. This is so bad that even at director level we now need guidance, governance and compliance directives and regulations. We became control freaks, everything centralized and monitored, CCTV cameras are everywhere and doing more filming than Hollywood. We took all responsibility and accountability away from the place where the business actually gets done, and gave it to people called supervisors and managers; how many times a week do you hear? “I have to refer to my manager/ supervisor” or even worse “this can only be approved by my Head-Office”—a place which I have never seen and where I am very sure nobody knows you!
Furthermore, if we analyze the biggest operational losses shouting at us from the pages of global newspapers every day, we can only conclude to one of two causes, firstly it was caused by a management override (often a complete misuse of authority and power) or secondly by a lack of management oversight. This should leave business leaders with only one question, having on board some young blood who succeeded growing up by taking care of themselves and making their own decisions, why must we continue to pay a bunch of managers who cause the biggest losses in history? Trouble surely comes when people spend more time trying to keep their jobs, than to do their jobs.
Posted by Whatan, Dubai, UAE on Thursday 29 October 2009 at 16:52 UAE time
Why does nobody want to be in charge any more? Nobody wants to be bossed; and nobody wants to be the boss. People are abdicating more and more responsibility every day. This is so bad that even at director level we now need guidance, governance and compliance directives and regulations. We became control freaks, everything centralized and monitored, CCTV cameras are everywhere and doing more filming than Hollywood. We took all responsibility and accountability away from the place where the business actually gets done, and gave it to people called supervisors and managers; how many times a week do you hear? “I have to refer to my manager/ supervisor” or even worse “this can only be approved by my Head-Office”—a place which I have never seen and where I am very sure nobody knows you!
Furthermore, if we analyze the biggest operational losses shouting at us from the pages of global newspapers every day, we can only conclude to one of two causes, firstly it was caused by a management override (often a complete misuse of authority and power) or secondly by a lack of management oversight. This should leave business leaders with only one question, having on board some young blood who succeeded growing up by taking care of themselves and making their own decisions, why must we continue to pay a bunch of managers who cause the biggest losses in history? Trouble surely comes when people spend more time trying to keep their jobs, than to do their jobs.
Talk is cheap - Its time for change !
Posted by BRANDO, London, GB on Wednesday 28 October 2009 at 19:50 UAE time
Great article and very good points, they need to get back to basics, it has been proved that many of the big corporations and worlds leaders cannot and should not continue in the way they have over the past 20 years. It does not work and they have done a very poor job of leading/managing both businesses and the masses.
They need to come up with something that actually works and is more sustainable....it is now time to see if they really are worth those huge paychecks.
Talk is cheap - Its time for real change !
Posted by BRANDO, London, GB on Wednesday 28 October 2009 at 19:50 UAE time
Great article and very good points, they need to get back to basics, it has been proved that many of the big corporations and worlds leaders cannot and should not continue in the way they have over the past 20 years. It does not work and they have done a very poor job of leading/managing both businesses and the masses.
They need to come up with something that actually works and is more sustainable....it is now time to see if they really are worth those huge paychecks.
Talk is cheap - Its time for real change !
Mobile
