Damas facing AED114m court claim from JV partner

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

Dubai jewellery retailer Damas International has said it will "vigorously defend its interests" after revealing that it is being sued by a joint venture partner.

The company said in a statement that it had received a legal notice from Al Manara Jewellery, notifying the retailer and one of its subsidiaries Damas Jewellery of a claim filed before the Abu Dhabi Courts for AED114.7 million.

The case, it said, is in relation to "one of the joint venture business that the subsidiary had participated in Abu Dhabi".

The civil suit filed by the joint venture partner claimed compensation of an "apparent breach of the joint participation agreement that the subsidiary of Damas had signed when establishing the venture".

"The company firmly believes the case to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend its interests related to this civil action," Damas said in the statement.

On Sunday, Damas announced that it was taking "all reasonable steps" to recover the money owed to the company by the Abdullah brothers.

The company said in a statement that it was working with the Abdullah brothers but it was taking more time than expected to secure the funds.

"Given the complexity involved in transferring, selling the assets declared to the company, it is taking more time to affect the recoveries as per the timeline mentioned in the previous announcement by the company on November 4 2009," the company said.

"The delay in payments does not constitute an event of default under the agreements," it said, adding that the amount of $55m to be paid by the Abdullah brothers on or before April 30 would be carried forward.

Related:

Market Performance

Damas International
0.41
0.0 0.0 (%)
Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: Ali

Dani, no one is denying they made mistakes but to say they acted with 'bad intentions, thinking they can fool investors and the system' is a poor judgement. 'Merits' - they have been decicated from the earliest age to developing a strong, highly respected and successful family business. 'Ethics' - they have a reputation in the market for being trusted and reliable, always giving genuine quality and value. Without 'acumen' they wouldn't have become recognised as one of the leading Jewellry firms in the region. Look back at what they have acheived and you will see it is all based on merits, ethics and acumen but if you knew them, you would already know this.

Posted by: Dani

Ramnik, it is not about the blood or the neutralisation, it is about merits, ethics and acumen. If they committed a mistake, and they did do it, it is because of their poor attitude and bad intentions, thinking they can fool investors and the system. shame on them. For, they should be judged based on their deeds and not what passport they hold or what country they hail from. Shame on you Ramnik, for you tried to disguise your libel

Posted by: Ramnik

I have known Abdullah Brothers even before they were neutralised to Emirati and they have been very good Human being. Their Syrian blood will not let them default any payments. they must have done all this by-mistake and we should give them chance and forgive them.

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

All comments are subject to approval before appearingTerms and conditions

Further reading

Features & Analysis
Your guide to looking sharp in business

Your guide to looking sharp in business

Arabian Business presents its top 20 Spring/Summer Trends of...

1
Ever increasing circles

Ever increasing circles

When two friends found their local community lacking the caf...

The world's most influential Arabs: Power defined

The world's most influential Arabs: Power defined

Putting together a list of the world’s most powerful Arabs is...

Most Discussed