Dubai ruler issues decree to freeze rents in 2009

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum on Monday issued a decree stopping any increase in rents on residential and non-residential properties in Dubai in 2009 for tenants who renew their contracts signed last year.

Mohammed Ibrahim Al Shaibani, director of the Dubai Ruler's Court, said the decree was aimed at curbing the growing increase in property rents in the emirate.

He said it was aimed at maintaining a balance between the interests of both landlords and tenants and to ensure stability in the real estate sector, reported news agency WAM.

The new decree also appears to hand greater power to landlords who have complained that, in certain cases, the five per cent rent cap has kept the rents they can charge well below normal market levels.

The decree says that rents for both residential and commercial units set last year are frozen – unless they are more than 25 per cent below the guideline figure recommended in Dubai’s new rental index.

Last week, Standard Chartered bank predicted that rents in Dubai were "unlikely" to rise in 2009 because of the weakness of the labour market.

In a report published, the bank said "demographic and employment" levels were key to determining rents.

The study came as Dubai's Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Rera) revealed it had finalised its rental index that it hopes will replace the need for rent caps in the future.

The Standard Chartered report added: "Our view is that rents are unlikely to increase in 2009 (making the cap unnecessary) not because of the falling housing prices but because of the reported weakness in the labour market."

Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: Dr. Dolittle

It is clearly evident that given the current state of affairs, something needed to be done by the concerned parties to protect the interests of their own. Having the landlords up in arms over the rent caps for the last few years, created an opportunity for the authorities to pacify them this time around. Now that most expats are packing up owing to spiralling costs, landlords are now the biggest losers with them having to lose more money! The WHY? The logic is landlords lost 'potentially' more earnings than forecasted owing to the rental caps in place over the last few years. Now with the mass exodus of expats, they need a way to make up for that deficit caused by the Government and their rules. The Answer! Impose rent increases on people they haven't managed to get yet! The guys who were smart enough to come in early and choose rental properties wisely! For those that came in last year (2008), the landlords had their share of their dosh. Lets skip that lot (for now). Voila, A rental solution that makes everyone happy!!! Well, if statistics indicate the same, then it must be true...?

Posted by: Abdul Haque

The Rent Index announced by the Rera is in li9ne with the rentals in UAE ( ) Some tenants are paying rents for 3 bed rooms villa just 120,000/- per year ( ) It is not rediculous in paying this rental for a villa in a good and posh locality ( ) If somebody want to have less rental they should move to Ras-Alkhima, Ummm sequan and other remopte places of the emirates ( ) The landord invested large sum of their hard earned money atleast to get reasonable rents out of the investments ( ) Abdul Haque

Posted by: duncan

What adds insult to injury in the whole RERA fiasco is that these heightened rents we have seen over the last few years are what has forced people to share villas. This is supposedly illegal but in truth it is what has supported the over inflation of housing costs. If only families lived in these villas, no one would be able to afford to pay the extortionate rates currently being charged, demand would drop massively and the market would adjust accordingly. However people are still sharing, and being forced to do so more and more by the ever increasing rental costs, thus further compounding the issue. While there are no easy answers, landlords and the government trying to have their proverbial cake and eat it is only pouring more fuel on the fire. Meltdown anyone?

Posted by: Paul

Being a resident of the Springs, and having read through the relevant section of the rental index (2nd half of 2008) as well as the Decree No 1 of 2009 in more detail, I am wondering about the following: 1 - the rent for a 3-bedroom villa in the Springs is indicated (rental index) to be somewhere in between AED 250k-280k. Having had a look at some of the popular Dubai real estate websites (e.g. propertyfinder.ae and dubizzle.ae), it appears that this type of villas in the Springs is currently on offer for rent for as low as AED 170k (several properties listed at that price); and that a large number of similar / comparable villa units in the Springs is currently available for rent under AED 200K. Assuming that the "real" market rental price for a good number of these villas is currently in between AED 170k and AED 200k, this would indicate that the rental rates proposed by the rental index are by some AED 80k (or 40-45%) over the current market price. Something appears to be "out-of-bounds" here... 2 - the same rental rate band applies to a similar / comparable villa unit in the Arabian Ranches (according to the index). Everyone in Dubai knows, that similar / comparable units in Arabian Ranches are by 15-20% higher than in the Springs. How shall that work ? Someone explain to me, please... 3 - The Decree No 1 of 2009 states in Article (4), ad (2) that the Real Estate Regulatory Agency (RERA) shall review and update the Rent Index of the Emirate of Dubai "periodically"... Well, given the above examples, it is probably time to start reviewing the index NOW (beginning 2009). It is most obvioius that the rates published in the index are not only completely outdated by now (from mid 2008); moreover, they are by some 40% over the current "real" market rental rates. An urgent review is therefore indicated - shall the rent index ever have any meaning... This needs finetuning - quickly... !!

Posted by: Suresh

In any other part of the world , the person who earns an income or makes a profit , pays the tax. But here in Dubai we who pay the rent ALSO pay the tax - the land lord pays nothing. The economic department charges me a 5% tax on the rent I pay for my house and another 5% as my wife is also a director in the business - though we are occupying only ONE house ! Neither logical nor fair. I am also made to pay an arbitrary tax on the accommodation occupied by my staff. Not just that as a commercial enterprise we have to pay 15% of our rent value as tax to the Dubai land department. Not logical and not fair. If any one can explain why WE pay taxes for the money we spend but the landlords do not pay tax on the money they make I shall be grateful.

All comments are subject to approval before appearingTerms and conditions

Further reading

Features & Analysis
'Cruise with Nakheel' is offering an inside glimps of ongoing construction on Palm Jumeirah

Palm Jumeirah: Frond N project

New $80m project keeps development moving on Nakheel's iconic...

4

Real estate in Ras Al Khaimah

The $1.9bn Al Hamra Village is at the front line of Ras Al Khaimah...

4
organ Stanley, dubbed 2012 'The Year of the Landlord'

Rise in rental demand lifts US housing sector

With unemployment and home foreclosures rising, many Americans...

Most Discussed
  • 48
    Brits must respect UAE culture more - diplomat

    the majority of expats (as most people here argue that its a majority painting an entire nation the villain)....why are the filipinos and indians not the... more

    Sunday, 20 May 2012 9:17 AM - Arthur
  • 32
    Saudi Arabia bans use of Western calendar

    I dont think its that a big deal to be honest. companies and people who already work in saudi are aware of the Hijri new year so it woudnt affect them... more

    Wednesday, 23 May 2012 3:21 PM - Nas-h
  • 27
    Disputed Gulf islands belong to UAE - poll

    It is the Arabian Gulf because firstly Persia hasn't existed since 1935 and, therefore, does not appear on modern maps. So, by saying Persian Gulf we are... more

    Sunday, 20 May 2012 7:40 PM - Juma Said Juma
  • 25
    Nakheel targets 'young and trendy' for Palm project

    Palm Jumeirah = Disneyland. Is this the kind of community to invest in for a home ???? or a hotel ? It baffles me why people would invest in an apartment... more

    Wednesday, 23 May 2012 4:13 PM - Paul
  • 19
    Iran eyes Google legal action over Gulf naming

    Instead of clinging to anything that reminisces you of your obliterated past, why don't you spend sometime fixing your disgraceful and humiliating present... more

    Tuesday, 22 May 2012 9:30 PM - Fahd