Emirates reaps $105m in extra charges in a year - study

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

Dubai’s Emirates Airline reaped $105.7m worth of revenue from non-airfare fees such as excess baggage and onboard spending during the year to March 31, a global analysis of airlines’ ancillary revenue has revealed.

Ancillary charges – such as fees for choosing a seat, boarding early or buying duty free goods in the air – are increasingly beefing up airlines’ bottom lines, according to the report by IdeaWorks Company.

It found a total of $27.1bn in extra charges was collected by 53 airlines that make available their financial figures for their respective fiscal years incorporating 2012.

The figure was double the result in 2009 when $13.47bn was charged, and more than 10 times the $2.45bn recorded in 2007.

Emirates’ Australian alliance partner Qantas recorded the largest ancillary revenue per passenger in 2012, at $56.21, up $6 on 2011.

It was the fifth highest overall, raking in $1.575bn.

American airlines dominated the list, with United at the top. It collected $5.352bn in ancillary revenue, including from its new fee to check in a second bag on US-Japan routes, making up more than 14 percent of the airline’s total revenue.

It was followed by Delta, American and Southwest.

While they were the largest figures in terms of dollar value, ancillary revenue made up a more significant portion of overall revenue for low cost airlines, such as Ryanair (21.8 percent), which IdeaWorksCompany estimates has 18 passengers paying for assigned seating on each flight.

By comparison, Emirates’ ancillary revenue accounted for only 0.5 percent of its overall revenue of $19.4bn and represented a mere $3.16 per passenger, according to the report.

The only other two Middle Eastern airlines included in the report were Jazeera Airways, which accrued $13m in extra fees (6 percent of revenue), and Air Arabia, which generated $10.8m (1.3 percent of revenue).

Related:
Companies
Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: Grammar pedant

Let's hope RAH isn't an EFL teacher!

Posted by: lastman

I disagree, RAH. If the sentence had read American Airlines, rather than American airlines, you might have had a point. As it is, it makes perfect sense to me.

Posted by: RAH

"American airlines dominated the list, with United at the top. It collected $5.352bn in ancillary revenue?"

Your "it" is referring to which airline exactly? American or United (that has collected $5.35bn)?

Starting a new sentence with "it" (singular) when you have two preceding nouns is just poor writing/English skills where vagueness supersedes clarity.

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

All comments are subject to approval before appearing

Further reading

Features & Analysis
Playing by the numbers: Saudi Arabian Airlines

Playing by the numbers: Saudi Arabian Airlines

Why is Saudia only mentioned as an afterthought when one talks...

Ports of change

Ports of change

Investment in ports in the GCC region is at a record high, as...

Crowded skies in the Middle East

Crowded skies in the Middle East

Aviation experts give their suggestions on how to solve the Middle...

Most Discussed