Freezing fees for ‘unacceptable’ schools doesn’t make sense

The closure of a Dubai school this week highlights a flaw in the KHDA fee structure, Courtney Trenwith argues

The closure of Dubai American Scientific School (DASS) announced this week highlights a flaw in the way Dubai school fees are calculated.

The DASS was forced to close after charging parents double the fees allowed by the education authority, as well as failing to investigate more than 30 students with extended periods of unauthorised absence, a number of health and safety violations and appointing 20 teachers without a formal contract of employment or approval from the Knowledge and Human Development Authority (KHDA).

It had been rated by the KHDA as ‘unacceptable’ for each year since 2008-09 so it seems a positive step to have the school shutdown – half of its students had already been transferred to new schools in the past year, according to the KHDA, and those remaining surely deserve a better education that DASS was seemingly able to provide.

However, it is no wonder the school was unable to improve. Under KHDA regulations the worst schools – those rated ‘unacceptable’ – are not allowed to increase their fees beyond the Educational Cost Index (ECI) until they move up to at least the ‘good’ level (the second highest of four categories).

But without government funding, a lack of charities dedicated to education and on top of that, stalled fees, how is a school supposed to improve?

Yes, good teachers are a school’s biggest asset and far more important than having the latest technology or the biggest gymnasium. But attracting the best teachers cost money, and so too does training and up-skilling.

And in today’s world, having state-of-the-art technology does make a difference to a graduate’s outcomes in the real world. So does a well-rounded education with access to sport and recreation, a library full of books updated each year and a well resourced science classroom.

All of these things require money.

I am certainly not defending DASS’s performance – according to KHDA there were ongoing issues that the school and its owners failed to address.

And there does need to be an incentive for schools to improve, especially from an unacceptable level. But freezing fees in line with the ECI seems only to work against them, while those already offering a superb education (there were six rated as ‘outstanding’ this year) are allowed to increase their - usually already high - fees by twice the ECI.

(No school is allowed to increase their fees for the 2013-14 academic year after the Dubai Statistics Centre calculated that the cost of education had not gone up in the past year. The ECI was 3 percent for 2012-13).

Schools can apply for an exemption to raise funds for major works such as an expansion but it does not include improving teachers’ salaries or hiring new teachers, rental increases on existing buildings (which in the present Dubai climate are likely to go up while revenues remain stagnant) or purchasing technology.

I’m not advocating an open-door policy on school fees – past comment pieces by me prove that. But I am saying there needs to be an alternative incentive for schools to improve other than freezing their fees if they don’t. It just doesn’t make sense.

Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

NOTE: Comments posted on may be printed in the magazine Arabian Business

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: Maroosha

The school fees in Dubai are already extremly high and parents are struggling to eduacte their children here. With what we are paying to educate small children in elemtary levels, students in many parts on the world are getting A class university education for less. Instead of asking KHDA to allow increasing school fees, we should ask for good education at reasonable fees.

Posted by: Saudi Engineer

As in any business, you have to handle profit along with loss. Private schools are no exception. If you are offering a low-quality product, no one will want to buy it. Offering the low quality product at a higher price will only cause you to lose further customers. At some point a business owner (or a school owner) must make a decision - to either cut your losses and leave the business all together, or to pay more to improve your product and increase your losses in the short term in order to improve your product and reputation in the long run.

Posted by: Omar

Interesting article with logic argument,,,when regulators try to control cost ,they need to be aware of all circumstances and open up to the other side point of view

Posted by: kiliman

The writer has no clue as to why KHDA insists that school fees can be increased only after the rating improves. If this was not the case a school can increase fees under the pretext of improving quality ..but will the quality improve and can they be held responsible ?
Let the school deliver and then ask for an increase...Make an improvement to the product before you can ask for a price increase..

All comments are subject to approval before appearing

Most Discussed