Google chief slams Gulf Twitter-related detentions

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

Jailing Arab Twitter users could lead to greater physical action such as violent protests, a Google executive has told Arabian Business in an exclusive interview.

Ross LaJeunesse, global head of Google's Freedom Expression project, said the silencing of controversial social media comments would only lead to boiled up tensions that would eventually need to be released.

"I see freedom of expression as a release valve: people have those thoughts, people have those concerns, they want to articulate them and when a government takes an approach (such as jailing dissidents), what you're really doing is forcing those concerns and debate internally, it doesn't go away," LaJeunesse said during an interview on the sidelines of the Freedom Online conference in Tunis.

"So in many ways, letting people articulate them and debate them and have conversations about them is very healthy for society.

"I don't think any interest is served when you say, 'no, you can't speak'."

Preventing freedom of expression online could backfire with street rallies and protests, he said.

"It's absolutely possible," LaJeunesse said.

"It also drives it underground."

Dozens of social media users have been jailed in states such as Kuwait and Bahrain for posting comments on sites such as Twitter and blogs that have been deemed defamatory, blasphemous or insulting to the Emir.

A Tunisian rapper also was sentenced to two years jail this week for a song that contained lyrics about killing the police.

In one of the most high profile cases, Egyptian satirist Bassem Youseff, who has become the most watched Arab on YouTube since that country's 2011 revolution, was arrested over his political satire show.

Saudis Arabia's conservative Islamic leaders also have attempted to shutdown mor censor sites such as Twitter on the basis that they are tools to stir social unrest and inspire immoral discussions.

LaJeunesse said governments that stifled freedom of speech online had failed to come to terms with the new era of Internet communication.

"Those governments are taking the approach of old world media, which they're very accustomed to controlling," he said.

"They're trying to apply those rules and laws to the Internet and it really doesn't work.

"All it does is increase the pressure on people."

LaJeunesse said during the most recent meeting of the International Telecommunications Union, which includes government representatives of more than 190 countries, more than 80 states voted against a proposal to add the Internet to the list of telecommunications covered by the organisation's policy, an indication they were unwilling to move into the 21st century.

A Gulf state also proposed a policy that would have given states the right to demand content they didn't like to be removed from not only websites in their own country but globally. The proposal was voted down.

La Jeunesse said human rights were at the heart of the concern, but privacy activists and companies such as Google had to take a different tact - usually economical - when dealing with some governments, including those in the Gulf.

"In some parts of the world, the human rights argument doesn't get you very far," he said.

"You don't shy away from the truth but you focus on the economic development. (You say) 'this is how you use the Internet to get (economic development); you can't have economic development while you stifle free speech'."

Related:
Topics
Companies
Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: Anwar Ali

Unfortunately the electronic medium is extremely powerful, as has been proved in recent Arab Spring successes, yet it is very open; so open that it is subject to abuse and misuse. This power, with a widespread and easy access, gives "freedom of speech" to everyone - on everyone's smartphone.

It is fashionable to express unqualified support to freedom of expression! Yet one can imagine it being used for all kinds of "not so innocent" goals. As far as Google, FaceBook, Twitter and such other companies are concerned, it is in their interest to spearhead opposition to anything seen as attempt to curb freedom of expression. Otherwise they will go out of business soon. One can also imagine that some sovereign intelligence agencies use it as a tool of their evil and vicious maneuvers. Think, think, think before giving unequivocal support.

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

All comments are subject to approval before appearing

Further reading

Features & Analysis
Bringing Hollywood to the desert

Bringing Hollywood to the desert

The seventh instalment of Fast and Furious — one of the biggest...

Little-known investor poised to score big with Twitter IPO

Little-known investor poised to score big with Twitter IPO

New Yorker Suhail Rizvi has quietly amassed a $1bn 15% stake...

Location… twofour54

Location… twofour54

Is Abu Dhabi’s twofour54 the right place for you to set-up business...

Most Discussed
  • 5
    UK politician sacked over burka binbag jibe

    The whole point is that women should dictate what they want to wear and not men. That should be the underlying motive. If a woman WANTS to wear a burqa... more

    Wednesday, 27 August 2014 1:16 PM - mick
  • 4
    UAE teens among the highest for obesity rates

    There are loads of fatties in Dubai. They don't offend me personally. Unlike other countries where taxes support the health system, here, each person has... more

    Wednesday, 27 August 2014 4:04 PM - nice
  • 3
    Smoke-free Dubai - the big debate

    In the UAE the individual, as well as the outlet, have the choice which is a good thing. I like to enjoy a smoke with my beverage and would shun an outlet... more

    Wednesday, 27 August 2014 1:10 PM - axeman