Palm service charges were 'fair and very competitive' claims CEO Sanjay Manchanda
Indebted Dubai developer Nakheel has claimed it was made a "scapegoat" during the high profile Palm Jumeirah service charge debacle, the CEO of the government-owned firm has claimed.
"We were made the scapegoat. It was being said that we were not doing enough and we were increasing charges, but on the contrary people have found out that these were unfounded allegations against us," Nakheel CEO Sanjay Manchanda told the Emirates24|7 news website.
"We are encouraging our customers and owners to play their part in the whole development… You cannot expect services to be rendered without a cost. And that's the new reality in the freehold areas. If you demand services you have to pay for it. We are confident the prices we are asking our consumers to pay is a fair and very competitive," he added.
Master developer Nakheel’s long running battle with its customers on the Palm Jumeirah started in December 2011, when it banned more than 1,300 residents from using the beaches and gyms at its Shoreline Apartments residences and claimed it was owed US$20m in unpaid service charges.
In February, Manchanda told reporters the iconic developer is considering taking legal action against residents who have not paid their service charges in a bid to recoup some of the $35m outstanding.
“We will work with RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) on this one... If that is the only way the owners want me to take,” Manchanda said. “The legal resort is available. I don’t want to go there in all honesty. It is not the [route] we would want to take.”
The debacle has had an impact on Nakheel as last summer real estate agents told Arabian Business tenants were starting to shun apartments on the palm-shaped island over the ongoing row.
The row escalated in July when Nakheel drained all six swimming pools at another development, its prestigious Marina Residences towers after it was revealed over US$4m in service charges remained unpaid.
While Nakheel refilled the pools, real estate agents said the ongoing negative publicity has meant renters are now shunning its developments on the Palm and some existing tenants are demanding a rebate on their rent or are seeking to relocate.
“The articles written recently about the problems of service charges or lack of payments to properties on the Palm are, I am sure, having a negative effect,” said Mario Volpi, head of residential sales and leasing at Cluttons.
“When we are offering a wide selection of properties there does now appear to be a reluctance [towards] the Nakheel properties on the palm. The questions from prospective tenants are mainly along the lines of whether the landlord is up to date with his/her maintenance payments,” he added.
Nakheel, Dubai’s biggest developer by assets, was hit hard by the global economic downturn, which saw property prices in the emirate decline by more than 65 percent from their 2008 peak.
The slump forced Nakheel to write down the value of its real estate by US$21bn and prompted a bailout from the Dubai government.
The firm's decision to ban residents from using its facilities has been heavily criticised.
In an interview with Arabian Business earlier this year, UAE business leader Khalaf Al Habtoor, chairman of Al Habtoor Group, slammed the company, claiming the decision would never have been approved by the Dubai government.
“It was 100 percent [damaging] and unacceptable. If I am buying a house and using the beach and later told I have to pay for the beach, this is abnormal. This is damaging the reputation of my country,” he said.
“I am 100 percent sure that the higher authorities were not aware of such a thing because they would not have accepted it…. They would never have [agreed to] it but some people try to show they are making money for the government - they are damaging its reputation 2m times [over] for a few dirhams,” Al Habtoor added.