Saudi heiress ridiculed by judge in $3m Ritz gambling case

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

An “unimaginably rich” Saudi heiress who lost £2 million ($3.3m) in one night of gambling at a London casino has been ridiculed by a high court judge and ordered to pay everything she owed, according to British media.

Noora Abdullah Mahawish Al Daher, the daughter of a wealthy Saudi and married to Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr bin Hamad bin Hamood Al Busaidi, was sued by The Ritz hotel’s Piccadilly casino after cheques that she used as credit while playing a card game, totalling £1 million ($1.66 million), bounced.

Al Daher, 47, launched a counter-claim, arguing that staff wrongly allowed her to gamble on credit. She claimed she was a gambling addict and should be given back the £1 million ($1.66 million) she had already paid.

But UK High Court Judge Anthony Seys Llewellyn threw out her case, saying she was fully responsible for her actions, the Daily Mail has reported.

Judge Llewellyn said the loss was no catastrophe for “Princess Nora”, as she is known.

He said her wealth was so extreme she had once had £6 million transferred into her account over a period of 10 days after claiming she “needed it to pay for the kids”.

Two months after her losses in London, she and her family lost another £3 million in Las Vegas, the court heard.

“Mrs Al Daher is a person of wealth unimaginable to the ordinary person and, I suspect, to many of moderate or substantial wealth,” Judge Llewellyn reportedly said.

“The enormous sums she gambled and the enormous losses she sustained were within her means.”

It took Al Daher just hours to reach her £1.7 million cheque limit playing the card game punto banco – a type of baccarat at the Piccadilly casino on April 3, 2012.

At her request, the limit was then extended to £2 million. She also lost the addition amount, while also giving out £14,000 in tips to the dealer and other staff, the Daily Mail said.

During the case, Al Daher argued she had been a “vulnerable” gambling addict since 1999, and casino staff were at fault because they had “positively encouraged” her to keep playing when she reached her limit.

“I refused to deal with the thought that I was a gambler and, for that matter, a high roller,” she told the court.

“I always felt that I was in control and could stop whenever I wanted to... I needed someone that night to tell me to stop playing and bring me to my senses.”

But Judge Llewellyn said she had given no sign that her gambling was out of control and she did not present any medical or psychiatric evidence to show she was a gambling addict.

She had been a regular at the casino and often spent “outrageously”.

“She exhibited no signs of distress, irritation, anger or loss of control that evening,” Judge Llewellyn said in his verdict.

“It is striking that she and her family gambled away five million US dollars in Las Vegas in June, some two to three months later.

“The scale of her wealth... is an inescapable feature of this case, as is the fact that, for those with the means to do so, it may be acceptable, or even enjoyable, to ride the roller coaster of losses.”

He rejected claims that Mrs Al Daher had been given credit in breach of gaming rules.

Al Daher, who lives in Muscat, was ordered to pay the £1 million she owed, plus interest.

Related:
Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: Hugh Jarse

To me it's a case of arrogance, with an over-riding belief that because of her wealth and "status" she could do whatever she wishes and therefore bully or muscle her way out of paying her debts.
stand-alone event? - doubt it.
Chalky/ Mick - both fair points.
Can you imagine the epic tantrum which would have been thrown if the Ritz had indeed applied the policy she so wished and refused her credit to gamble and insisted on cash?!
Now that's a clip that would have viral on Youtube!


Posted by: chalky6766

I would hope that we can leave religion and nationality out of this and just concentrate on the facts. Hugely wealthy, confirmed high roller, well aware of the risk factors involved in the possibility of curating huge losses as well as huge gains. She would never of tried this in the US the fact that she even considered doing this in the UK is rather telling. I hope she pays swiftly the costs of this case as it would be a travesty to ask the British tax payer to foot her legal costs.

Posted by: chalky6766

@Mick..Respectfully I must disagree with your assessment as this to me is more a case of her having enough funds to blow a million on a court case just to try and save face ref her losing money. In addition if she were that bothered about her position and religious background then she would never have brought this case. I simply don't see the need to score points here ref religion and they say we say debates, it's purely money, end of story.

Posted by: Mick

sorry chalky.....no can do....

next time expats are criticised for their lack of morals....let's think back at old Noura the Saudi who can't keep her "haram" habits in check.

You gamble, you pay. Next time, practice your card game before you bet a mil

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

All comments are subject to approval before appearing

Further reading

Features & Analysis
Building a BIZness: Q&A with Hazel Jackson

Building a BIZness: Q&A with Hazel Jackson

Since landing in Dubai in the 1990s, Hazel Jackson has built...

Smoke-free Dubai - the big debate

Smoke-free Dubai - the big debate

Will the emirate ever be smoke free? We spark up the conversation...

6
Mentoring matters: Mowgli Q&A

Mentoring matters: Mowgli Q&A

Kathleen Bury, CEO of mentoring foundation Mowgli, on why mentoring...

Most Popular
Most Discussed
  • 20
    Why Dubai should consider removing the rent cap

    Not even one comment supporting the author. I wonder if he is trying to create a bubble. more

    Monday, 24 November 2014 2:25 PM - Anil
  • 14
    Life sentence for London hammer attacker

    The death sentence is a free pass. The purpose of punishment has always been to provide a lesson for misbehaving. No one learns a lesson by dying. Life... more

    Friday, 21 November 2014 2:02 PM - LordLands
  • 5
    Is this the end of F1?

    Compare this to WEC and you see a stark difference. The 'formula' for WEC is much more wider and more accomodating. They have been runnning hybrids for... more

    Monday, 24 November 2014 2:30 PM - Vincent