Too big to sail question in Costa Concordia sinking fiasco

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share
Costa Cruises chairman and CEO Pierluigi Foschi. The firm has blamed the ship's captain for the disaster

Costa Cruises chairman and CEO Pierluigi Foschi. The firm has blamed the ship's captain for the disaster

In 1912, the RMS Titanic, the largest and most advanced passenger liner of its day, sank in the Atlantic Ocean, reminding the world there was no such thing as an invincible ship.

The Costa Concordia, a cruise ship so enormous that it is essentially a floating town, lies half submerged off the coast of Italy, making the same point today. The Titanic tragedy, which claimed some 1,500 lives, ushered in a new era in maritime safety law. A century later, the Costa Concordia debacle, in which 11 people have died and more than 20 are missing, raises the question of whether those measures are being effectively enforced.

The answer has direct implications for millions of seaborne travelers. The number of passengers on cruise ships has grown every year by an average of 7.6 percent since 1980, reaching 15 million last year.

To contain the pools, gyms, zip-lines, rock-climbing facades and multiple restaurants today’s cruisers expect, the ships keep getting bigger and bigger. The Costa Concordia carried more than 4,000 passengers and crew. Larger ships hold 6,000 people. With so many passengers on board comes the potential for great loss should disaster strike.

For the Costa Concordia, that moment came on Jan 13, when its captain, Francesco Schettino, deviated from an authorized, computerized course to maneuver the ship close to the island of Giglio and ran it into a reef.

[Click here for images]

The cruise line, Costa Crociere, and its parent, Carnival, have been eager to paint the disaster as the fault of Schettino, who is under house arrest and is expected to be charged with manslaughter. The companies’ position may be justified, but only up to a point. Costa Crociere has acknowledged previously giving Schettino permission to skirt the coast of Giglio. The practice of saluting ports in this way demands scrutiny. So does the record of the captain - who not only wrecked the ship but also abandoned it and refused an order by the Italian Coast Guard to return to help evacuate passengers - and the competence of those who promoted him.

Regardless, the responsibility for what happened after the ship ran aground suggests a wider circle of blame.

Passenger accounts strongly suggest that the Costa Concordia crew lacked training and discipline, and ignored basic international standards for passenger safety. At least some passengers say they received no safety briefing onboard. When the ship ran aground, passengers were given conflicting instructions about whether to stay in their rooms or abandon the Costa Concordia. Crew assistance to passengers trying to get off the listing vessel was haphazard at best, leading to panic and chaos.

The International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, adopted after the Titanic sank, clearly states that there should have been an emergency drill within 24 hours of the start of the ship’s voyage. Passengers who boarded afterward should have received safety briefings. From the moment the captain gave the signal to abandon ship, the crew should have loaded and launched the lifeboats within 30 minutes. As the search for missing vacationers attests, that was not accomplished.

Clearing the ship of all passengers in half an hour may sound like a tall order for a vessel with more than 4,000 people aboard. It’s not. First, for every three passengers, one crew member was there to assist with the effort. Second, these large ships are designed to hit a 30-minute evacuation deadline. Cruise ships that take on or drop off passengers at U.S. ports must pass this test twice a year in drills required and monitored by the U.S. Coast Guard.

The U.S. Coast Guard also requires that such ships present records proving that they have completed fire and evacuation drills once a week and that each crew member has participated in such drills at least once a month. These standards, established by the Safety of Life at Sea convention, have been promulgated by the International Maritime Organization. But as part of the United Nations, the organization relies on the coast guards and navies of member states to enforce the rules.

Article continues on next page…

Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

  • No comments yet, be the first!

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

All comments are subject to approval before appearing

Further reading

Features & Analysis
Is Dubai ready for 20,000 more hotel rooms?

Is Dubai ready for 20,000 more hotel rooms?

Can the city cope with the additional supply predicted by Dubai...

Oman, the hidden treasure

Oman, the hidden treasure

Relatively few have experienced the wonders of Oman but multiple...

Review: Corinthia Hotel, London

Review: Corinthia Hotel, London

The legendary property off Trafalgar Square has launched a new...

Most Discussed
  • 8
    Has Narendra Modi already lost the plot?

    Do something for your country instead of giving an overview from outside the country. This article does not have indepth view of the policies announced... more

    Thursday, 26 March 2015 2:47 PM - umas
  • 4
    Nakheel PR: The toughest job in Dubai?

    I would suspect the damage is done. Nakheel should have put its customers first and made them allies. Instead, it has treated them as second-class citizens... more

    Friday, 27 March 2015 2:42 AM - Chris
  • 3
    Drunk passenger who slapped air stewardess jailed in Dubai

    @Nezaud is 100% correct. Infact I think it is utter hypocrisy for airlines to complain about Drunken passengers when it is they (the airlines) who are... more

    Friday, 27 March 2015 2:42 AM - Robert Carter