Font Size

- Aa +

Sun 17 Aug 2014 10:06 AM

Font Size

- Aa +

Banking giant joins Qatar World Cup debate

Credit Suisse warns of cost overruns and inflationary pressures

Banking giant joins Qatar World Cup debate
Lusail Iconic Stadium.

Banking giant Credit Suisse has warned of the consequences should Qatar lose the rights to host the World Cup in 2022.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch have already weighed into the debate as the world awaits the findings of a FIFA corruption probe into the awarding rights, which is being conducted by international lawyer Michael Garcia and is due to be unveiled next month.

In its latest report, Credit Suisse suggests equities could fall 20 percent should Qatar lose the World Cup in eight years’ time.

However, it stresses the loss could provide an opportunity for buyers to snap up potential bargains.

Qatar plans to spend $212 billion in the next seven years to build the football stadiums but also a rail network, metro, housing and a new city.

Although these developments will go ahead regardless of the prestigious football tournament, concerns have been raised over possible delays should the country be stripped of the hosting rights.

Credit Suisse is also far from convinced that a one-off event such as the World Cup will have a lasting economic impact, citing data from recent tournaments which show that tourism numbers are not always sustained after the football fans go home.

In Brazil’s case, for example, the country’s investments related to the World Cup and upcoming Summer Olympics couldn’t prevent a slowdown in gross domestic product growth.

“History suggests that while such events promote growth and employment in the tourism and hospitality industries, the benefits are not translated into sustained economic growth unless it is supported by a long-term strategy for the improvement in infrastructure that directly benefits the economy and its residents,” it said.

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Credit Suisse predicts the World Cup will have a particular effect on petrochemicals, cement and infrastructure followed by real estate, healthcare, education and utilities.

While it said World Cup-related spending should underpin credit growth and corporate earnings in Qatar, it also warned: “Over the medium term, there will be concerns related to the potential cost overruns (which have been considerable for previous hosts), not to mention the potential for a substantial buildup in inflationary pressures.”

For all the latest banking and finance news from the UAE and Gulf countries, follow us on Twitter and Linkedin, like us on Facebook and subscribe to our YouTube page, which is updated daily.
Raj Janardhan 5 years ago

Qatar has bitten off more than it can chew! If this is viewed purely from a sporting perspective you need 20 a side playing to make this world cup happen in the blistering heat. Unfortunately this element of nature "heat" supports no sport! As sport is a business now, these basics never find a place in the intellect of the mighty governing bodies that are drowned in the pool of power and money! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one, wrong season for sport in the Qatar summer and wrong season for the soccer league business in the winter...a double whammy which ever way you look at it!!!! Qatar winter is the only sensible answer (that would be saving grace) OR a summer elsewhere kinder is the other answer!!! Save your GDP Qatar!

Anon 5 years ago

Ace stuff from Raj!