We noticed you're blocking ads.

Keep supporting great journalism by turning off your ad blocker.

Questions about why you are seeing this? Contact us

Font Size

- Aa +

Wed 16 Nov 2011 07:28 AM

Font Size

- Aa +

Palm spat raises fears over homeowners’ rights

Nakheel’s bid to privatise beach clubs raises questions over buyers’ rights to communal areas

Palm spat raises fears over homeowners’ rights
Nakheels flagship development, Palm Jumeirah

Nakheel’s bid to privatise the beach clubs at its Palm Jumeirah Shoreline development could spur other property firms to attempt to monetise communal facilities in their projects, as homeowners pay the price for hastily-signed boom time contracts.

The state-backed developer plans to charge homeowners at the Palm apartments up to AED5,000 a year to access the building’s pool and gym facilities, in a dispute that has raised questions over ownership rights to communal areas in Dubai residential projects.

At the heart of the matter is the gap between the marketing literature used to sell offplan properties during Dubai’s real estate boom, and details outlined in investors’ contracts.

Homeowners that failed to check the small print in their sales and purchase agreement (SPA) may find they do not own the rights to communal facilities, potentially clearing the path for developers to now privatise them, said Brent Baldwin, associate at law firm Hadef & Partners.

“In most cases the definitive document governing who owns what will be the SPA,” he told Arabian Business. “Purchasers need to check….that what they think they are buying is covered in the SPA.

“I’m not saying a brochure wouldn’t stand up in court but, if the developer refuses to accept that the brochure is legally binding, then going to court is all you might end up with.”

Service fees and additional charges have become a particular bone of contention between developers and homeowners since the collapse of Dubai’s real estate market in late-2008.

Developers who once saw millions of dollars in profit during Dubai’s real estate boom have struggled to stay afloat after the emirate’s property bubble burst, leading buyers to accuse companies of charging inflated fees for building upkeep or access to promised facilities in a bid to maintain a revenue stream.

Any move to retrospectively charge for access to beach and pool facilities in buildings would be a further deterrent to investors mulling property deals in the emirate, said Charles Neil, CEO of real estate consultancy Landmark Properties.

“Developers overpromised and under delivered,” he said. “It’s really bad for the development community because investors in future just aren’t going to trust them and that’s why they’ll never get an off-plan market going again – because investors now want to touch it, feel it and see exactly what’s on offer.” 

Marketing literature distributed to buyers of Shoreline apartments states each group of four apartment blocks will have access to “to their own exclusive health club” and other leisure facilities. But under plans proposed to residents in September, Nakheel Marine & Leisure will charge residents AED5,000 a year and open the beach club up to non-residents for AED12,000.

In a letter to Dubai’s real estate watchdog (RERA), homeowners have called for the agency to step in and declare them the legal owners of Shoreline’s communal areas, a move that would smooth the way for a housing association to dictate its own service charges for facilities.

 “[This] is not what the owners want. All the boards of all the owners associations believe that the clubhouses are part of the common property of the Shoreline,” said one investor, who asked not to be named. “The description laid out in the UAE law [law 27 of 2007] points to them being common property as well.

“All the [owner associations] have written to RERA letting them know what we thought we had purchased - i.e. what we believed we were sold by Nakheel.”

Maria Rubert, partner at legal firm Cramer-Salamain, said the dispute raised questions over whether tighter curbs were needed to ensure marketing peddled by developers was an accurate reflection of the end product.

“Obviously this would raise huge questions [regarding marketing] because these represent what they were selling with this literature,” she said. “I am aware of cases where this kind of literature has been used against developers.”

 Tenants living at the Tiara Residence on the Palm Jumeirah were told last month their families and guests must pay AED200 to use the pool, gym and beach at the weekends. Developer Zabeel Properties said in a circular to residents that the move was measure to reduce overcrowding.

Dubai Properties Group told Arabian Business in September that tenants in its $1.6bn Jumeirah Beach Residence development would also have to pay for access to its long-awaited beach club when it opens later this year.

Arabian Business: why we're going behind a paywall

Real news, real analysis and real insight have real value – especially at a time like this. Unlimited access ArabianBusiness.com can be unlocked for as little as $4.75 per month. Click here for more details.
telcoguy 8 years ago

More reasons to rent I guess.
Eventually people will learn to read what they sign.

2fillsworth 8 years ago

In a number of cases, the gym and pool are owned and operated by seperate entities, for example Shoreline 7&8, although most likely they were solid to investors as being part of the building.

As this will not likely to change, the homeowners association must ensure that the cost that a proportion of the building costs are charged to these entity. They must not be able to operate in the building without having to pay for the costs of the building maintenance. An alternative is to have the HOA request special owners rates for these facilities as they will also target tenants of other developments including Golden Mile.

A number of the owners in these building are definately frustrated due to the smoke and mirrors employed by Nakheel however they need to utilise the HOA to ensure they get a good deal and also ensure the entity pays their part of the service fees.

Chef 8 years ago

Dear Telco Friend,
These people read what they signed. Its states will have access to “to their own exclusive health club” and other leisure facilities.
You see Own. Not Nakheel not Dubai properties OWN.
This needs to go to court and than we wil see. One thing for sure this is BAD for the market (Dubai) and the view on Dubai worlswide.
Have faith as we will all need it.

realist 8 years ago

Owners wont win
Pay up. Lifes to short for all the hassle fighting it...move on

Glen 8 years ago

Does anyone think that people will look at buying property with all the disputes that have arisen. If the buyer has no rights, he will have no interest.

Ennoyed 8 years ago

In JBR the brochures and handover booklets given to happy owners showed 7 gyms, 1beach park (exclusive for residents and turned into a parking), 4 beach clubs with minimum fees for JBR Residents, HOA's 1 year after handover (In 2008). JBRIOA are still waiting for any of the above. RERA asked DPG (In 2009) to provide HOA's all information about accounts and audit as a condition to approve 2009 budgets. Till now there have not provided anything and still they are charging SC's at a higher rate than any similar building around. RERA was approached at several occasions but are not able or willing to implement the existing laws. The deadline to register HOA's (Oct 2010) is passed and nothing yet.

John Felton 8 years ago

'Common Property means those parts of a Multi-Ownership plot......iincluding within such definition all open areas, common access areas,services and facilities..........walkways ,corridors and lobbies...and (if any) the gym, swimming pool and portions of vehicle parking areas, berths and other leisure facilities'
Declaration of the Palm Jumeirah 14th day of May 2007

Artemis 8 years ago

Why stop at charging for the Swimming pools, many years ago in UK they used to have daylight charge depending on how many windows you had, so why not charge for the light coming through the windows, after this you can charge for the scenery, why not, the flat owner does not own it..why stop there, why not oxygene tax for breathing in the air.... me jests ofcourse but wait and see, many more ingenious ways will surface to extract money for those who "invested" . This the reason I rent, I refuse to buy untill the authorities inpliment transparent regulations.....without hiding behind small print...

shankar 8 years ago

I have stopped buying properties in Dubai since the last 2 years.. I am a contented man now. Laws are never transparent.. it can change any time.. so why waste your hard earned money in such places. Advice is sell your property for whatever value and live in peace

yasin 8 years ago

simply home asoociations should hold up all the payments including service charges until the issue is resolved.