We noticed you're blocking ads.

Keep supporting great journalism by turning off your ad blocker.

Questions about why you are seeing this? Contact us

Font Size

- Aa +

Tue 17 May 2011 12:43 PM

Font Size

- Aa +

The dawn of a new energy era in the Middle East

The cost of the Fukushima nuclear crisis in Japan has shifted the spotlight to solar power, writes Vahid Fotuhi

The dawn of a new energy era in the Middle East

In just four months, 2011 has proved a memorable year for the Middle East. But while media attention has focused on the unfolding political changes, a more subtle shift is taking place in the region’s energy sector.

Historically, the Middle East has been focused on the extraction and exportation of fossil fuels. But as oil and gas reservoirs start to show their age and as new fields become harder and more expensive to develop, the region is eyeing alternative forms of energy to satisfy its growing energy needs. The obvious choice so far has been nuclear power.

Nuclear is branded as the most secure form of energy, requiring minimal fuel and minimal cost for 40-60 years. From an environmental point of view, nuclear is also the best choice, generating far less CO2 emissions than conventional fossil fuels. While renewable energy such solar and wind are equally environmentally friendly they have not been as reliable.

As a result, governments across the Arab world have been tripping over each other to adopt nuclear power programs. Even Saudi Arabia, the custodian of the world’s largest oil reserves recently made headlines when it declared that nuclear power is “a must”. The revolving doors at hotels in Riyadh have since been busy welcoming senior executives from foreign nuclear companies armed with shiny shoes and even shinier sales pitches.

Earlier this year, those revolving doors came to an abrupt stop. The dramatic explosions at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant and the ongoing uncertainty surrounding its safe shutdown has led many people in this region to ask: is nuclear power worth the risk?

It’s true that historically nuclear power has been the least expensive and most reliable form of clean energy. But things are changing.

In the past 10 years, there has been a dramatic shift in the cost of solar power, with prices dropping by some 50 percent. Industry experts expect solar costs to continue dropping in the coming decade as the industry continues to come of age.

On the other hand, the cost of nuclear power is set to rise. After the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in the US, construction costs for nuclear reactors rose 95 percent. After the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine, construction costs rose another 89 percent. The construction costs soared because of design changes required to address safety concerns. The same price hike is likely to take place following the Fukushima incident. As the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed El Baradei recently said: “In the past we had to plan for the unexpected. Now, we have to plan for the impossible.”

Planning for the impossible will not be cheap. Nor will the clean-up costs should something go wrong. Compensation claims from the Fukushima explosions are expected to exceed $100bn. With liabilities like this, investors will think twice before committing to nuclear projects.

In terms of the potential for solar power, no other region is as endowed as the Middle East. In fact, if we were to sprinkle Saudi Arabia’s Rub Al Khali desert (Empty Quarters) with solar panels, we would produce enough energy to power two earths.

And of course there’s the safety issue. No matter how small the risk of another Fukushima accident may be, it can never be excluded. Even if nothing goes wrong, there remain questions about the sustainability of the radioactive waste that gets buried underground. In comparison, solar power is completely recyclable and does produce any bi-products that could harm us or our planet.

This new energy equation has shifted the spotlight to solar power. A recent survey by the Swiss bank Sarasin believes that one third of new and old nuclear capacity will be replaced globally by renewable plants with an overall capacity of 500 Gigawatt. Moreover, the oil giant Total’s recent majority-stake acquisition of SunPower at a cost of a $1.4bn is further evidence that the smart money is now on solar.

In Majles’ across the region there is now more and more talk about solar power. The UAE has led the way with the creation of Masdar and its official plan to deploy some 1,500MW of solar power by 2020. Saudi Arabia, never to be outdone, recently came out and announced plans to install some 18,000MW of solar power over the next 20 years. The momentum is rising. All that is missing now is an over-arching regulatory framework and an incentive structure to give life to the region’s nascent solar industry. The events in Japan will no doubt serve as a catalyst and help lay the foundation for policies that will allow this region to make far better use of its most abundant form of energy: the sun.

2011 will be remembered not only as the dawn of a new political era in the Middle East but also the dawn of a new energy era.

(Vahid Fotuhi is the chairman of the Emirates Solar Industry Association. The opinions expressed are his own.)

Arabian Business: why we're going behind a paywall

For all the latest energy and oil news from the UAE and Gulf countries, follow us on Twitter and Linkedin, like us on Facebook and subscribe to our YouTube page, which is updated daily.
Real news, real analysis and real insight have real value – especially at a time like this. Unlimited access ArabianBusiness.com can be unlocked for as little as $4.75 per month. Click here for more details.
Bashar M 9 years ago

Let's hope we can see the promised regulations sometime soon. Nice arcticle Vahid :)

Sudeep Alex 9 years ago

Solar power is smart power indeed. Mr. Fotuhi, your view on the topic is wonderful. Is the initial cost for nuclear and solar power equivalent, considering the land area, machines/instruments, infrastructure etc? We don't need to go for nuclear power just for the heck of it right?

Craig 9 years ago

Many energy experts have said that nuclear is the cheapest option, but are they really taking into account dealing with toxic waste that slowly decays over thousands of years and the cost of storage? The USA has been in nuclear power for years and still has not managed its waste problem. I've often heard of the cost per watt, but never the cost of storage and treatment of this waste.

Even if this cost was calculated correctly into the cost per watt, I’m sure the owners of the Fukushima never envisaged a clean-up bill totaling billions from a disaster.

Nuclear may produce less CO2 than other forms of power generation, but it is the only "clean" form of energy that generates waste that is so poisonous to life that it cannot be exposed for thousands of years. This is far from clean.

Now is the time review the nuclear goals and look to the sun. Solar for this region is the way forward.

Fuad Jezzeny 9 years ago

It is appalling that we as so-called "rational intelligent" beings would even consider such an ugly form of energy...nuclear. The leading nuclear country on earth is the USA, yet someone needs to remind the rest of the people on earth, that the USA has NOT built a new nuclear plant for over 43 years, and that is for ONE reason...the "poisonous, dangerous, waste". No state in the entire USA, will now permit for the waste to be dumped or stored in their state, hence, the problem. And yet you now have the promotors of Nuclear (France, Korea, Japan etc.) trying to convince the Arabs to install this ugly form of Energy. Wake-up my dear brothers, these promotors have no respect for us...FACT.

bkay 9 years ago

What we seem to forget is that our global economy is run by oil/gas major's, an industry representing the majority of our GNP. We must accept that these companies will not leave a barrel of oil, nor a cubmeter of gas in the ground, including new discoveries, this will all be exploited. Knowing this and with present technologies will result in Xtrillion of tons of CO2, no way around it. Other than renewables, our drive must be, knowing that these fossil fuels will be exploited, to invest in R&D and more efficiently deal with the use of fossil fuels like oil, gas, coal etc. We know that these low to zero fossil fuel technologies are here today, it takes "market push" a company or government willing to make these investment (at an even lower cost than any other alternative source), as fossil fuels are here to stay and will dominate the energy markets for centuries to come...whether we like it or not...

Khalid Aleissa 8 years ago

Solar energy so far is a romance story and cannot be a solid step to build a family. Nevertheless, nuclear power is the way to go. However, having in mind nuclear is not a just a technical sophistication, but also has other dimensions of more serious complications, that is, political (internal and international), legal complication, a last but not least economic complications (for example; long-term investment and future decommissioning cost). One misleading factor in the nuclear economy calculation is the elimination of nuclear waste cost just because of its present small manageable volume.