Briton fined AED3,000 for insulting Ramadan

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

A British expat has been fined AED3, 000 for insulting Ramadan on a social networking site and calling her colleague a dictator, it was reported Wednesday.

The 31-year old woman, who admitted posting a status update on her Facebook page expressing her dislike for Ramadan, was charged at the Dubai Court of Misdemeanours on Tuesday, according to The National.

The colleague of the accused, an Egyptian woman, said in a statement to the court that she had seen a “disrespectful” status update about Ramadan on September 4 last year. 

“I told her to not say such things about the holy month as she was in a Muslim country,” she was quoted as telling prosecutors by the paper.

The accused responded by calling the woman stupid and ignorant and saying she was a closed-minded dictator and a follower of bin Laden, said the newspaper.

Police referred the accused to prosecutors eight months later on charges of insulting a religious creed. That charge was dismissed before being referred to the court on insult charges.

Judge Mohammed Ahmed Shoaib fined the accused AED3,000. 

Dubai police officials warned last month that non-Muslims risk arrest if they are caught eating in public during Ramadan, when consuming food and drink is banned under UAE laws between sunrise and sunset.

Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: Tran y Blick

I think the point is being missed here, the woman was fined for insulting her co-worker not for her remarks about Ramadan.

To quote

Police referred the accused to prosecutors eight months later on charges of insulting a religious creed. That charge was dismissed before being referred to the court on insult charges.

Why are people so quick to look to be offended?

Posted by: Umm Omar

At Morten,

1. A status update is NOT an opinion and nor is an insult.
2. Opinions should be shared in discussions where people have been invited into.
3. Laws are NOT opinions. When laws are set in any country, like not eating before sunset inpublic during Ramadan, they are to be adhered to and are punishable if broken.
4. When we communicate (it whatever shape or form) we do it to succeed (passing on valuable information or knowledge) in sending a message accross.
5. To communicate successfully, one should consider the audience being addressed, the content of the message and the tone being used.

The UAE judicial system credible and fair that many residents including Western expats trust. People living in the Muslim /Arab world have agreed to live within these set systems upon deciding to settle in these countries.

Posted by: Akram

If you are a guest in a country, you should respect the customs and follow the laws of that country. If you disagree with or dislike these customs and laws, then you should head back home.

I assume expats left their home countries and settled in UAE because they got something they couldn't get back home. Let's keep that in perspective.



Posted by: sonnydubai

Very true Akram, shame your opinion is not shared by the "guests" that the UK allows to live in its towns and cities each year......

Posted by: A Good Friend

3000 AED fine and lose of one "friend" on facebook !!! The british lady was no good in criticizing other religion's traditions (irrespective of the country she lives in) but the other lady also is no better - reporting her friend/ FB buddy to authorities on a silly discussion on religion...

That's why google plus is putting circles of friend to filter :-)

Posted by: Essa

Why does this happen in Dubai? Freedom of expression does not mean freedom of insolence. Dubai should deal severely with such offenders because such cases are on the increase. Dubai should not become the haven of Islamophobics. Such offenders MUST be sent home.

Posted by: gordon robertson

I cant believe those comments.
The comments themselves are intollerant.

If a crime is commited then punishment is set according to the severity of the crime.

othwerise you would be deporting everyone.

An illegale immigrant poses more risk to a country, they are not insured, they are unable to get legal employment with all its legal implications. Health, criminal, housing, protetcion from abuse etc.

How is it possible to compare those two?

Posted by: Kohinoor

If a labour overstays, he is banned from reentering the country even if he is alone a breadwinner of his family. But, if someone violates religious and cultural norms, he pays only 5% of his salary and walk away to do it again.

Why not deportation and lifetime entry ban?

Posted by: Mazen

@ Essa

I could not agree with you more! If expats / tourists do not want to obey the laws and customs of the host country then they should be taken to the airport, put on a plane and barred from reentry...

All comments are subject to approval before appearingTerms and conditions

Further reading

Features & Analysis
Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah.

Saudi Arabia marks king’s accession as region applies pressure

The country marks the seventh anniversary of Abdullah’s accession...

Special Report: Ras Al Khaimah

CEO Middle East takes an in-depth look at the UAE’s northernmost...

Power night: 100 most powerful Arab women

An event to celebrate the 100 most powerful Arab women

2
Most Discussed
  • 142
    Etisalat warns customers of phone call scam

    I just got a call from this number +971507896582 stating that I won 500000AED and that i should check the back of my sim card for some numbers and call... more

    Friday, 25 May 2012 3:04 PM - haja
  • 39
    Saudi Arabia bans use of Western calendar

    Given that the start of the new month is determined by the moon sighting, isn't this going to make organising meetings for the following month a bit tricky... more

    Thursday, 24 May 2012 1:24 PM - Mark Renton
  • 20
    UAE officials warn against marrying foreigners

    I am a UAE national married to an Iranian and her unwavering allegiance is toward Iran and she does not espouse any Arab cause, the same applies with my... more

    Friday, 25 May 2012 11:54 PM - Yasser
  • 8
    English football mulls champagne prize ban

    Taking religion based decisions in such matters is wrong. It sends wrong signals and sets up bad precedence. What next? Will they stop serving beef in... more

    Friday, 25 May 2012 12:15 PM - Skand Bhargava
  • 3
    Dubai banks eye mortgages for foreign buyers

    There are so many promises with no substance out there that even none savvy buyers will think twice before taking risks on Dubai Real estate market. Too... more

    Friday, 25 May 2012 9:19 PM - Bob
  • 142
    Etisalat warns customers of phone call scam

    I just got a call from this number +971507896582 stating that I won 500000AED and that i should check the back of my sim card for some numbers and call... more

    Friday, 25 May 2012 3:04 PM - haja
  • 39
    Saudi Arabia bans use of Western calendar

    Given that the start of the new month is determined by the moon sighting, isn't this going to make organising meetings for the following month a bit tricky... more

    Thursday, 24 May 2012 1:24 PM - Mark Renton
  • 25
    Nakheel targets 'young and trendy' for Palm project

    Palm Jumeirah = Disneyland. Is this the kind of community to invest in for a home ???? or a hotel ? It baffles me why people would invest in an apartment... more

    Wednesday, 23 May 2012 4:13 PM - Paul
  • 20
    UAE officials warn against marrying foreigners

    I am a UAE national married to an Iranian and her unwavering allegiance is toward Iran and she does not espouse any Arab cause, the same applies with my... more

    Friday, 25 May 2012 11:54 PM - Yasser
  • 19
    Iran eyes Google legal action over Gulf naming

    Instead of clinging to anything that reminisces you of your obliterated past, why don't you spend sometime fixing your disgraceful and humiliating present... more

    Tuesday, 22 May 2012 9:30 PM - Fahd