Emirates airliner 'centimetres' from disaster - paper

  • Share via facebook
  • Tweet this
  • Bookmark and Share

An Emirates Airline jet came within centimetres of crashing at Melbourne airport last month when it barely cleared the 2.4-metre perimeter fence on takeoff, it was claimed Sunday.

Referring to an Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ASTB) investigation update Australia's Melbourne Herald Sun newspaper said it had been placed in the most serious category of aircraft mishap available to it - an accident, rather than an incident.

"During the take-off the aircraft's tail scraped the runway surface. Subsequently smoke was observed in the cabin," the newspaper report said.

A preliminary report is due out before the end of the month.

The pilot of the Airbus A340-500, carrying 225 passengers on a flight to Dubai aborted the flight and made an emergency landing in Melbourne after dumping fuel over the ocean.

Two pilots have since resigned.

An investigation by the Sunday Herald Sun claimed that the flight - EK407 to Dubai - almost failed to become airborne and barely made it over the airport perimeter fence, half a kilometre away.

The fully-laden Airbus A340-500 was believed to have been travelling about 280km/h when it reached the end of the runway without becoming airborne.

At the last minute, the two pilots 'rotated' the plane - or pulled its nose up into a steep ascent - causing its tail to crash into the end of the runway, it was claimed.

Despite its steep climb, the plane was still so low that it wiped out strobe lights that were only 70cm high and positioned 170m from the end of the runway.

It then took out an antenna, believed to be near a small building, before barely making it over the 2.44m wire perimeter fence, the newspaper also claimed.

Join the Discussion

Disclaimer:The view expressed here by our readers are not necessarily shared by Arabian Business, its employees, sponsors or its advertisers.

Please post responsibly. Commenter Rules

Posted by: j

As an active airline pilot, I find many of the comments on here extremely ill informed. That's somewhat understandable, given many peoples need to 'guess' what went wrong in order to re-assure themselves about flying. It's a highly complicated job, involving the management of expensive machinery, many people from many cultures, time pressures, and of course lives. Whatever the cause is found to be, the pilots did a superb job of getting an injured aircraft back on the ground with not even an injury. Comments like those from Marwa (regarding the aircraft 'diving' from the sky, then refusing to get on a subsequent flight, due to no 'proof' of it being another aircraft) show an astonishing ignorance!! Firstly, despite the movie industry's typical depiction, aircraft don't 'dive' from the sky after suffering an engine failure! They are designed, certified, and the crews thoroughly trained to fly with an engine inoperative. Not to mention that a professional aircrew would never jeopardize thier own lives, licence, or the lives of the passengers by accepting to fly an unsafe aircraft! We value our own lives as much as, or more than, the passengers - remember that our own self-preservation is a powerful driving force. Please keep in mind that there are hundreds of things that can go wrong on any flight. It's the professionalism of manufacturers, engineers, dispatchers, cabin crew, and pilots, that keep it such a safe form of transportation. Emirates crews are sourced from countries around the world, mainly western europe, the americas, and australia. They uphold the utmost highest standards and come to Emirates, each with thousands of hours of prior experience and training. Please bear all this in mind before jumping to conclusions!

Posted by: Vishal

Sorry to say, but that's what it is....I've had better service experiences on Etihad and, most recently, BA. Of course no airline comes close to Gulf Air in terms of poor quality of service.

Posted by: Mike

We were booked to Manila a couple of years back. Got to the check in line 3 hours before our flight. By the time we got near the counter, they announced that the counter was closed and we had to come back the next day and try to get the next day flight. Obviously the flight was over booked as there was still 45 minutes before the flight. Many people left. I and a couple of others started screaming. That's right, screaming! Long story short, free stay at the Meridien Airport, free meals, Free tickets for the three of us redeemable for a year, and a booked flight for the next day. But we still give EK a miss if we can. Qatar Air is my favorite by far.

Posted by: Abdul M. Ismail

If the Captain and First Officer resigned, then this is premature. They should have been grounded pending the result of the investigation. There are numerous factors that no one yet knows which could have led to the tail strike. Yet, the majority of critical comments here seem to come from arm chair pilots who have no idea about flying and aircraft engineering. The A340 should have taken off well before the point of "nose-up" so my guess (without having any facts) is the the engines weren't operating properly. The airspeed however was too high and the aircraft too far down the runway to abort the take-off so the only solution would be to attempt a steep climb in order to avoid the end-of-runway fence. If so, then tail strike or no tail strike, the pilots should be commended for their actions. We would have known by now if both Captain or First Officer were under the influence so that rules that out. We will have to wait and see. As a regular flyer, I'm very impressed with Emirates and I try not to fly with anyone else.

Posted by: Skyobserver

Sorry Marwa...Correction! The decision to return was made by the Skipper who knew the circumstances of the situation. If there was any risk then he would have made a divestion to the nearest available operational field (which might not have been DOH or DXB). The skipper has his own life to think of as well as the reposnsibility for the pax behind him. It is not a company decision to return to Dubai but the ultimate call of Captain of the flight. Whilst I have many axes to grind with EK, the decision of the Captain should not be confused with company policy. This is true for all Skippers in commercial aviation.

All comments are subject to approval before appearingTerms and conditions

Further reading

Features & Analysis

Racing ahead: The Gulf's luxury car market boom

Car manufacturers are witnessing a boom in the luxury-loving...

Top 10: Emerging logistics markets

Counting down the top emerging markets in global logistics

Geoff Mee, deputy CEO, Qatar Rail

Qatar railway: Ticket to ride

How will Qatar benefit from its US$37bn railway? Devina Divecha...

1
Most Discussed
  • 36
    Saudi Arabia bans use of Western calendar

    Given that the start of the new month is determined by the moon sighting, isn't this going to make organising meetings for the following month a bit tricky... more

    Thursday, 24 May 2012 1:24 PM - Mark Renton
  • 27
    Disputed Gulf islands belong to UAE - poll

    It is the Arabian Gulf because firstly Persia hasn't existed since 1935 and, therefore, does not appear on modern maps. So, by saying Persian Gulf we are... more

    Sunday, 20 May 2012 7:40 PM - Juma Said Juma
  • 25
    Nakheel targets 'young and trendy' for Palm project

    Palm Jumeirah = Disneyland. Is this the kind of community to invest in for a home ???? or a hotel ? It baffles me why people would invest in an apartment... more

    Wednesday, 23 May 2012 4:13 PM - Paul
  • 19
    Iran eyes Google legal action over Gulf naming

    Instead of clinging to anything that reminisces you of your obliterated past, why don't you spend sometime fixing your disgraceful and humiliating present... more

    Tuesday, 22 May 2012 9:30 PM - Fahd
  • 16
    Kuwait's ruler blocks MPs' Islamic law proposal

    several good points made here however democracy is about all the people and there are over 4 million people in Kuwait, Kuwaitis and expats we the expats... more

    Friday, 18 May 2012 7:32 PM - james